Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACKIN Samuel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 2 | SMITH Nicholas S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% |
| 3 | HE Lawrence | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 5 | MIRANDA Matteo | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 5 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 7 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 8 | PARK Vincent | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 9 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | FERREIRA Noah J. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 12 | PAK Charles | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 13 | AYALA Jaime | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | LAI Coby | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 15 | ATANASIO Joseph | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | CHEUNG Liyan | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | PARK Prestan S. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 18 | WU Joseph | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 19 | WU Byron | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | BURKE Cyril | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | DISIMONE David Z. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 22 | COETZEE Frans M. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 23 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | NOH Ray | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 25 | MISHIMA Torata | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 26 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 27 | CHONG christopher | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 28 | CHOI Marcus | 20% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | LOMBARDO WillIam | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | HA Daniel | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | GAO Daniel | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | FAN Russell | 18% | 53% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | SIMPSON Patrick | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 34 | SZEGO Bence P. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | FENWICK Luke A. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 36 | HEKMAT Sina R. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 37 | KWONG Jason | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | KHALITOV Alexander | 3% | 17% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KEMPSON Eric | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KALKANIS George | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 41 | LING Jaden | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 42 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 43 | CONNELLY Michael | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 44 | SUN Jason | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 47 | KUMAR Aidan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 48 | TAHOUN Aly | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LESSER Jeremy | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KIM Ryan | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MING Isaac | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CAPEILLERES Theo | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SUN Jeffery | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.