Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 2 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 3 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 5 | MIRANDA Matteo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 5 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 7 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 8 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 9 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | FERREIRA Noah J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | PAK Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 13 | AYALA Jaime | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 14 | LAI Coby | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 15 | ATANASIO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 16 | CHEUNG Liyan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | PARK Prestan S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 18 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 19 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | BURKE Cyril | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 22 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 23 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | NOH Ray | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 27 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 28 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | LOMBARDO WillIam | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | HA Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | FAN Russell | 100% | 82% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 34 | SZEGO Bence P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | FENWICK Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 36 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 37 | KWONG Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | KHALITOV Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | KEMPSON Eric | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 41 | LING Jaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
| 42 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 43 | CONNELLY Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 44 | SUN Jason | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 47 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 48 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LESSER Jeremy | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MING Isaac | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CAPEILLERES Theo | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.