Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | VERMEULE Spencer | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | MARAKOV Allen B. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V D V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
5 | ADLER Ian B. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
6 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | KANG Michael H. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
8 | BEDOR William J. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
9 | NTONOS Thrasyvoulos (Akis) | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
10 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
11 | ABDALLAH Ahmed | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
13 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | STUSNICK Hunter | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | D V D V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | TAE William G. | D V V D D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
17 | GIBSON Nowell L. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
18 | CULLEN Daniel F. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
19 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
20 | MACKIN Samuel | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
21 | SOOMRO Adam A. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
22 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | CHIN Ethan | V V D D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
24 | ZHANG Matthew | V D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | DECKER Tristan H. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
26 | MAISEL Simon F. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
27 | LEE Daniel Y. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
28 | ANDREEV Arthur | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
29 | CHERNYSHOV Max | V D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
30 | LEHR William D. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
31 | SHREM Samuel G. | V V D D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
32 | HE Lawrence | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
33 | GORDON Reis J. | V V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
34 | ALLEN Graham | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
35 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
36 | ZHANG YuJian | V V D V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
37 | MORSE Tyler | V V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
39 | BEKKER Mitchel | V V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
40 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | V V V V D D | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
41 | PAK Charles | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
42 | ALFAIATE Lucas | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
43 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
44 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
45 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
46 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
47 | YOON Nathan | D V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
48 | WU Joseph | D V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
49 | LIBSON Tazman | V D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
50 | MERCHANT Reza H. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
51 | SMITH Nicholas S. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
52 | PARK Frederick | V D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
53 | PARK Prestan S. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
54 | DIXON Samuel | V D V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
55 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | V D D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
56 | AGAON Shawn | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
57 | WU Byron | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
58 | LEE Timothy S. | D D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
59 | CHONG christopher | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
60 | RHYU Kozmo | D D D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
61 | SPANO Gideon S. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
62 | MIRANDA Matteo | D D D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
63 | KIM William M. | D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
64 | PERSAUD Daivik | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
65 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | D D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
66 | POLSTER Joshua | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | MISHIMA Torata | D V D V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
68 | KOLKER Gregory A. | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
69 | BURKE Cyril | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | HEKMAT Sina R. | V D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
71 | LIU John | D D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
72 | DIXON Thomas | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | LIU Jack | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
74 | LAI Coby | D V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
75 | BENKLER Yuriy | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
76 | MAAS Sean H. | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
77 | PRADHAN Aryan | D D D D V V | D | 0.2 | 2 | +1.8 |
78 | BASOK Nikita | V D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
79 | VERGARA Nicolas M. | D D V D D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
79 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
81 | AYALA Jaime | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
82 | ROWE Jason | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
83 | BINDAS Odinn A. | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
84 | LI Jeffrey | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
85 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
86 | STEFANOV Michael A. | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
87 | SUN Jeffery | D D V D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
88 | PARK Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
89 | SUN Jason | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
90 | ALAVOSUS James J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.