Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VERMEULE Spencer | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | ADLER Ian B. | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 6 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 7 | KANG Michael H. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | BEDOR William J. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 9 | NTONOS Thrasyvoulos (Akis) | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 10 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 11 | ABDALLAH Ahmed | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 13 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | STUSNICK Hunter | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 16 | TAE William G. | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 18 | CULLEN Daniel F. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 19 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | MACKIN Samuel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 23 | CHIN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 24 | ZHANG Matthew | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | DECKER Tristan H. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MAISEL Simon F. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 27 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 28 | ANDREEV Arthur | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 29 | CHERNYSHOV Max | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | LEHR William D. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SHREM Samuel G. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 32 | HE Lawrence | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | GORDON Reis J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | ALLEN Graham | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 35 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 36 | ZHANG YuJian | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 37 | MORSE Tyler | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 39 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
| 41 | PAK Charles | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 44 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 45 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 47 | YOON Nathan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 48 | WU Joseph | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | LIBSON Tazman | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | MERCHANT Reza H. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 51 | SMITH Nicholas S. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | PARK Frederick | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PARK Prestan S. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | DIXON Samuel | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 55 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 56 | AGAON Shawn | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 57 | WU Byron | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 58 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 59 | CHONG christopher | 11% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 61 | SPANO Gideon S. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 62 | MIRANDA Matteo | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 63 | KIM William M. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 64 | PERSAUD Daivik | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 66 | POLSTER Joshua | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 67 | MISHIMA Torata | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | BURKE Cyril | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | LIU John | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 72 | DIXON Thomas | 3% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | LIU Jack | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LAI Coby | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BENKLER Yuriy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | MAAS Sean H. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 77 | PRADHAN Aryan | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | BASOK Nikita | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | VERGARA Nicolas M. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 79 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | AYALA Jaime | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ROWE Jason | 49% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LI Jeffrey | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | SUN Jeffery | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | PARK Vincent | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | SUN Jason | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ALAVOSUS James J. | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.