Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | KOKENGE Reid | V D V V D D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 3 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | ROWE Jason | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 8 | MORSE Tyler | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | HE Lawrence | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | SOOMRO Adam A. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | DIXON Thomas | D V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 15 | WANG Eric S | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | MISHIMA Torata | D V V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | JUN Jaywu | D V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | KNOX James | D D V V V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 19 | KEMPSON Eric | V V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | D V D V V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 | |
| 21 | BEZRODNOV Michael | D D V V V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | KIM Tei D. | V D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 24 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | ZHAO Luhan | D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 26 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 27 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | GAO Daniel | V D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | LURVEY Samuel | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | PARK Frederick | D D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | WIECHMANN Colin | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | ZIAEE Armin | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | MAHESH Tarun | D D V D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 35 | WU Marcus | D V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 36 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 37 | MING Isaac | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | ROYTBURD Samuel | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 39 | CHERPELIS George | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 41 | WANG Max S | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 42 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.