Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 5 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 6 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 7 | ROWE Jason | 2% | 13% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 8 | MORSE Tyler | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 9 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 10 | SOOMRO Adam A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 11 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | DIXON Thomas | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 15 | WANG Eric S | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | MISHIMA Torata | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | JUN Jaywu | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
| 18 | KNOX James | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | KEMPSON Eric | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 21 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 22 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
| 23 | KIM Tei D. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 24 | ZHAO Luhan | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 26 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 28 | GAO Daniel | 2% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LURVEY Samuel | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | PARK Frederick | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WIECHMANN Colin | 11% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | ZIAEE Armin | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 11% | 52% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MAHESH Tarun | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | WU Marcus | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | MING Isaac | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHERPELIS George | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Max S | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.