Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIVERANT Skyler J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 2 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
| 3 | KUSHNERIK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 3 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 5 | DOLGONOS Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% |
| 6 | KRAVIT Connor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | |
| 7 | KIM William M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 8 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 9 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 10 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
| 11 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 12 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
| 13 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% | |
| 14 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 15 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 16 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 15% |
| 18 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
| 19 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 20 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 16% | 1% |
| 21 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 2% |
| 23 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | GROSSMAN August | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 25 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 4% |
| 26 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 29 | BOBROW Ansel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | LIU Frank | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 32 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 35 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 36 | ROWE Jason | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 39 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% | |
| 40 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | ZIAEE Armin | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | WANG Max S | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SHEN Max | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 50 | KIM Byung | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 97% | 72% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 85% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | MING Isaac | 100% | 82% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LOMBARDO William | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | KEMPSON Eric | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | WU Marcus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.