The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 2 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% |
| 6 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 7 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 8 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 9 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 10 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 11 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 14 | HOGE William P. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 16 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 17 | LIU Noah | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | MAJAM Audie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 18% |
| 21 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | FU Leon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 24 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% |
| 26 | APEL Gustaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 27 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 28 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 29 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 30 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | HSU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | ARMITAGE Liam | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | PERKINS Jaray | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 38 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | KIM Ian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 40 | SHAIKH Zaki | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 41 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 43 | SIM Ian | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LALUYAUX Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | NG Biwon | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUSTON Riley | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 49 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 50 | MACIAN Sergio | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 53 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SECONDINE James | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | JOHAR Manvik | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | SU Oliver | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 60 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BUEHLMANN Johann | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | HARTMANN Angelo | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.