Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 2 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | WU Jason | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 3 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 6 | PARK Frederick | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 7 | MISHIMA Torata | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 8 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 10 | AGAON Shawn | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
| 11 | MING Isaac | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | WEI Jonny | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | LI Jalen | 1% | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 14 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 15 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Damien | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Kamran | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 20 | AGAON Ethan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 21 | ARAVIND Athreya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | GONG Haixiang | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG ethan | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | THAKUR Om S. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | WOLFE Alex | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | WU Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CHEN Jun Ho | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SAKO Ayrton I. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | XIA Oliver | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KALKANIS George | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | TEH Steven | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | BYARS John | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | FENG du | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | MCWILLIAMS Miles | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 37 | XIE Brandon | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | WANG Max S | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HU Robert J. | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | YU Hunter | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | GWINN William | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | TANG WanLi | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.