Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | WU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 3 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 6 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 7 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 8 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 9 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 10 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 11 | MING Isaac | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | WEI Jonny | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | LI Jalen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 14 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 15 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Damien | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 19 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 20 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
| 21 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SAKO Ayrton I. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | XIA Oliver | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | TEH Steven | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | BYARS John | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | FENG du | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | MCWILLIAMS Miles | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 37 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | WANG Max S | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | YU Hunter | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | GWINN William | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | TANG WanLi | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.