New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 2 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 3 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
| 5 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 6 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 27% | |
| 7 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 8 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
| 10 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 11 | GUERRERO Isaac C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 12 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% |
| 14 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 15 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 10% |
| 16 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 18 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% |
| 19 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 20 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 7% |
| 22 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 24 | LI Ayren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 27 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 29 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GUO Justin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 31 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 34 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | XU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | WU Michael | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MORGESON Colin | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Salahudin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 43 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 46 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 91% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WU Benjamin | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MCQUIDE elliot | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | BRATTAIN Trey | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.