New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Joseph | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | AGAON Ethan | V V D V D D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | FELDMAN Jaemin | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | LIEF Isaac R. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | CHOI Aleksey | V V V D D V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 9 | ZENG Zihan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | GAO Daniel | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | D V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 14 | JOSLIN Tyler | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | AGAON Shawn | V D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | LI Jalen | V V D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | HE Lawrence | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | MISHIMA Torata | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | KOKENGE Reid | V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | SKAALAND Will | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | SHAH Maximilian A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V D D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 23 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | RICHARD Owen | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 25 | EKE Frank | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | PRIHODKO Max | D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | LAI Aedin | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 28 | ROLLO Emmett H. | V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 29 | KOBI Samuel | V D D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 30 | YANG Edward | V D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 31 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | V V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 32 | SANTOS Francisco M. | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | LEE Noah | D V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 | |
| 34 | TEH Steven | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 35 | CHEN Jun Ho | V D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 36 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 37 | FUSSMAN Yuval | V D V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 38 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | THAKUR Om S. | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 40 | GONG Haixiang | V D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 41 | LEE Hudson | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 42 | STABB Xuan | V V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 43 | WU Jonathan | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 44 | STEWART Charlie | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 45 | BEALS Alden | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 46 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V D D V D D | D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 47 | KALKANIS George | D V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 48 | OSTIGUY Cameron | D D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 49 | BRODSKY Julian | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 50 | HU Robert J. | D V D V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 51 | SONG Troy | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 52 | XIE Brandon | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 53 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 54 | KUBATIN Anton V. | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 55 | TANG WanLi | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 56 | LIU Jeremiah | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 57 | CHEN Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 58 | CHOI Christian | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 58 | BYUN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 60 | KIM Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 61 | MACNEILL Owen | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 61 | BYARS John | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 61 | PANDALAI Aryan | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 64 | TEREB Daniel | D D D D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 65 | MASSE Jack | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.