Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
| 2 | LEI Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 8% |
| 3 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 3 | GUO Joe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | 8% |
| 5 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 6 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 7 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 8 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 9 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 3% |
| 10 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
| 11 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 12 | HUANG Zijin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 14 | CHOI Isaac | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 15 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | HANRATTY Liam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 18 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 19 | ZHANG RUOMU | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | HWANG Samuel W. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 26 | GELLMAN Jonas B. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 27 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 5% | |
| 28 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
| 29 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 34 | COFFEY Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 35 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | GAMBOA Eric | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | PAI Nandan K. | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 40 | KWON Timothy | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KAGAN Spencer E. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% | |
| 46 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 47 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | LOU Kevin | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JIN daniel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | HARR Carver | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | SHEIKH Tariq | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 53 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.