Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI DYLAN M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 3 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 6 | HOOSHI JAYDEN C. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 7 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 8 | ORVANANOS Jorge | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% | |
| 9 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 10 | BAE Kevin | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 11 | LEE Jacob J | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 12 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 28% | |
| 13 | YOON DYLAN | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HORSLEY Alexander | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 15 | LIN James G. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 43% | 9% |
| 16 | LEE Jonah | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 17 | LI Matthew | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 37% | 8% |
| 18 | BADLANI Dev | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | LEWIS Akhil | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SONG Bryan | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | PO Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | MOHAMED Amir | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 5% |
| 24 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 42% | 12% | |
| 25 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | GUO Sean | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 28 | FINLEY Dylan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 31 | WANG Winston | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | RNO Kyler | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | HUANG Eythan | - | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PLASTARAS Trey | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 35 | BASAK Ashton R. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | MOHAMED Murad | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 39 | YAO Bradley | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 40 | TRUBETSKI David | 1% | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GARR James D. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 2% |
| 42 | LIGOS Alex M. | - | 22% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 1% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | GUO Justin | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 46 | REZA Farazi | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | NICOLL James | 19% | 44% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | POPE Alexander | 27% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | POIROT Max | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | XU Ethan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | LORANGER Peter | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HIGGASON Hugh | 33% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | MELE-KEAN Forrest | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | FRANK Amir | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHEN Kyle P. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 57 | MAGALONG William | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | WUN Jonathan | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | UNGERER Roger M. | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | BLACK Zachary | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | BECK Ethan | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.