Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOOSHI DYLAN M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
3 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
3 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
6 | HOOSHI JAYDEN C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
7 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
8 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% | |
9 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
10 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
11 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 20% | |
12 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% | |
13 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | HORSLEY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
15 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 9% |
16 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
17 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 8% |
18 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
19 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
20 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
21 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
22 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
23 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
24 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
25 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
27 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
28 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
29 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
30 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
31 | WANG Winston | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
33 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - |
34 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
35 | BASAK Ashton R. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
36 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
37 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
38 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
39 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
40 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - |
41 | GARR James D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | 2% |
42 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
44 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 99% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | GUO Justin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
46 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | NICOLL James | 100% | 81% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
48 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
49 | POIROT Max | 100% | 87% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
50 | XU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
51 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
52 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 95% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 67% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | MELE-KEAN Forrest | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
55 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
56 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
57 | MAGALONG William | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | WUN Jonathan | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
59 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
60 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
61 | BECK Ethan | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.