San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 2 | CASTELLY Luke | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 3 | DOWDELL Riley | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 5 | LO Jake | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 46% | 6% |
| 6 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 7 | LOFTUS Luca | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 8 | HE Zhiheng | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 9 | YU Austin | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | < 1% |
| 10 | PRAKASH Hari | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 11 | CHEN Zhengyang | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 12 | ZWICKER Jacob | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | TONG Samuel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 14 | KNUDSEN Travis | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | DONAHUE Lake | 8% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 16 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | RICHARDS Andrew | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LAURIMAA Emil | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 19 | MAJAM Audie | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | HOGE William P. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 21 | SINHA Zaan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | ARMITAGE Liam | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 23 | BHATT Arjun | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 24 | FU Leon | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | LI Ethan R. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 27 | HUSTON Riley | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 28 | LAU Christian | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
| 29 | PAK Elliot | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | KIM Teddy | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHAO Colin | 20% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHANG Andrew | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | HINTON Evan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | SHAIKH Zaki | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 36 | MIAO KUNQI | 8% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | SU Oliver | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | RICHARD silas | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | CLAES Lucas | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | CHENG Trevor | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | CHOI Zachary | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIU Noah | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HIGGINS Calvin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | SIM Ian | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | JAIN Samyak | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | BUEHLMANN Johann | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | NG Biwon | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | JOHAR Manvik | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | RAHMAN Zayd | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 50 | LIANG Eric | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | RAHMAN Yousef | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KIM Remington | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GOROZA Eric | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | NUGENT Jack | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | BAKKEN Archer | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CLARKSON Moby | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.