San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 2 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 3 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 5 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 6% |
| 6 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 7 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 8 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 9 | YU Austin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | < 1% |
| 10 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 11 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 12 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 16 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | RICHARDS Andrew | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 19 | MAJAM Audie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | HOGE William P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 21 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ARMITAGE Liam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 23 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 24 | FU Leon | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 27 | HUSTON Riley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 28 | LAU Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
| 29 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | SHAIKH Zaki | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 36 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | SU Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIU Noah | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | SIM Ian | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | BUEHLMANN Johann | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | NG Biwon | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | JOHAR Manvik | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 50 | LIANG Eric | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KIM Remington | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 55 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CLARKSON Moby | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.