Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 2 | ZHAO Corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 3 | DOELEMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 5 | JONES Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 6 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 7 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 8 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 9 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% |
| 10 | RICUTA Laurentiu Florentin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% |
| 11 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 12 | FERGUSON Magnus K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 13 | LAI Coby | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 14 | BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
| 15 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% |
| 16 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 9% |
| 17 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 19 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 21 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 3% |
| 22 | ROUSE Brian G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 23 | IORIO Max | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MATEI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 27 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 28 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 29 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 30 | GUI Runlin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 31 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 32 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WALTON Cameron L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 34 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 1% |
| 35 | HANCOCK Lloyd D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | CAFASSO Martin | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 38 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | WHITE Nicholas F. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | ZHANG William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 43 | RYAN Joshua P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | MILGRAM Aaron | 100% | 72% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | QUINLAN Sean | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 46 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 6% |
| 47 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 48 | SONG Troy | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 50 | WANG justin | 100% | 91% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | EANG Brynner | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | CHU Wenxi | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | PAGE Duncan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | GAVIN Liam | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | PEZZINO Matthew | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | SACCOMANNO Shelby | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | IORIO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 61 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 100% | 68% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 63 | MACNEILL Owen | 100% | 94% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | SEOL Austin | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 66 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | BUTTS Brendan | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 61% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | ZOU Xianyang | 100% | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.