New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 2 | PELOSKY Zack B. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 3 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 3 | MARX Oscar L. | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
| 5 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 6 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% | |
| 7 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 8 | PAE Brian L. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% | |
| 9 | AHN Jun | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | < 1% |
| 10 | LI Eric | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 11 | LI Owen | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 12 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
| 14 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 15 | GUO Sean | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | PAE Jonathan L. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 17 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 8% | |
| 19 | BING Charles | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | GOOR Julian | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | MIALL Steven A. | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | WANG Jackson | - | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 6% |
| 23 | GONG Benjamin | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | YAN Edward Tianshuo | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | MENG Zhaoyi | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 12% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | GUO Justin | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 4% | |
| 28 | ZHOU Andrew C. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 29 | MARX Jackson L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 30 | LI Yao (Liam) | 7% | 34% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | LIU Derek | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 32 | WANG Mason | 39% | 46% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | GAO Anthony | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 46% | 20% |
| 35 | CATINO Brennen | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | PROMRAT Pete | 20% | 52% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | XIANG Derrick | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | WU Alexander | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 40 | LI Ayren | 14% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | PITERBARG Maxim | 6% | 33% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | XU Ethan | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 45 | XU Andy P. | 1% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 47 | CHAN Justin D. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | HU Jason | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | HONG Issac | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | PEDERSEN Charles | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LI Aaron | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 52 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 53 | LORANGER Peter | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | ULC Christian | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | GUERTIN Matthew B. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.