New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
2 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
3 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
3 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
5 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
6 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
7 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
8 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
9 | AHN Jun | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | < 1% |
10 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
11 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
12 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
13 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
14 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
15 | GUO Sean | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
17 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
18 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 8% | |
19 | BING Charles | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
20 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
21 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% |
23 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
24 | YAN Edward Tianshuo | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
26 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
27 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | 4% | |
28 | ZHOU Andrew C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
29 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
30 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
31 | LIU Derek | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
32 | WANG Mason | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | GAO Anthony | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 20% |
35 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
36 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
37 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 80% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
39 | WU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
40 | LI Ayren | 100% | 86% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
41 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
42 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
43 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 94% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | |
44 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
45 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
46 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
47 | CHAN Justin D. | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
48 | HU Jason | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | HONG Issac | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
50 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
51 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
52 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
53 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
53 | ULC Christian | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
55 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
56 | GUERTIN Matthew B. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
57 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.