Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
2 | UVAROV Andrii | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
3 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
3 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
5 | BURGESS James E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
6 | LANGENDERFER Braeden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
7 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
8 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | |
9 | TEH Steven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
10 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 25% |
11 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
12 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - |
13 | JENSEN Daniel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
14 | CHUNG Yeongbin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
15 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
16 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
17 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
18 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
19 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
20 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
21 | PAULSEN Zachary | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
22 | GILLER Augustus | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
23 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
24 | WANG Max S | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
26 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
28 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
30 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
31 | YANG Zeph | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
32 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
33 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
34 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | WU Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
36 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
37 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
38 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
39 | WATT Darren | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
40 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
40 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
42 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
43 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
43 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
45 | KENT V David | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
46 | MORTIMER Gavin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
47 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
48 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
49 | PARK Augustine | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
50 | PENG Gregory | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
51 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
52 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
53 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
54 | SCHIEK Harrison | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
55 | NABAVI Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
56 | BROWN Allan | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
57 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 3% | |
58 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
59 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
60 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 93% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | WILSON Benjamin H. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
63 | PETROV Niki A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
64 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 90% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
66 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
67 | MCGRANE-MOFFITT Nolan A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
68 | ALI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
69 | FU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
70 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
71 | DUBOIS Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
72 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
73 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
74 | VENET Téva | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
75 | PARKS Isaac | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | |
76 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
77 | TAM Ethan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
78 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
78 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
80 | GOLDSON Tyrese | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
81 | ZOU Xianyang | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
82 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
83 | KMOSKO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
84 | KHANNA Keshav | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
85 | MANAUGH Guy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
86 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - | |
87 | CORRALES Victor M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
88 | EGAN Edward L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
88 | HICKIE Bryant | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
91 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
91 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
93 | BOGUSLAVSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 14% |
94 | BEAUCHAMP Reilly E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
94 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 11% |
96 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
96 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
98 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
99 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
99 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
101 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
102 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
103 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
104 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
105 | COLLUM Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
106 | WORLEY Aren R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
107 | VRAPI Dorian A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
108 | HANNON Owen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
109 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
110 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
111 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
112 | KIM Ian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
113 | ROBINSON Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
114 | WANG Albert | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
115 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
116 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
116 | SHULL Marc | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
118 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
119 | BLEICHER Simon | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
120 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 13% |
121 | BAXTER Max | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
122 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
123 | FENG du | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
124 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
125 | AYABINA JR John | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
126 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
127 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
128 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
129 | JU Hanul | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
130 | JANYSKA Allen | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
131 | SU Oliver | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
132 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
133 | MELCHER Charles | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
134 | DONDISCH Ilan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
135 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
136 | MODRUSAN Lukas | 100% | 91% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
137 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
138 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
139 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
140 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
141 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
142 | MITTLER Frederick | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
143 | MARTINEZ Gabriel | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
144 | MAJAM Brandon Audie | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
145 | MOHAMED Sabir | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
146 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
147 | MALAHOWSKI Patrick | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
148 | HADDLETON Mark | 100% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | |
149 | O'HAGAN Benedict | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
149 | DOERR Jeff | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
149 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
152 | TENHUNDFELD Jack | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
153 | ALAMO Brandon | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
154 | COSTA joao | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
155 | MARTINEZ Kenneth | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.