Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LEE Daniel Y. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | LEONE III Charles D. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
3 | CHEN Eric | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | WANG Clayton | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
5 | TRIMMER Colin | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | KROPP Jack | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
7 | ZHANG Caden | D V V V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
8 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
9 | MURPHY Thomas P. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
10 | KIM Dylan J. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
11 | SU Caleb | D V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
12 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V D V V D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
13 | CLICK Aiden | V D V V D V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
14 | KARNAS Karol | V D V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
15 | USDIN Anton | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
16 | WANG Tristan | V D D D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
17 | CAO Albert | V V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
18 | NORTH Alexander M. | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
19 | JORDAN Anton | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
21 | FISHMAN Rahm | V D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
22 | TIRADO Giancarlo | D V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | WANG Trontour | D V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
24 | JONES Tyler | V D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
25 | ZHANG Richard | D V D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
26 | KWOUN Miles S. | D V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
27 | HUTTO Joshua | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
28 | DUAN eric | D D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
29 | METZLER Calder | V D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
30 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
31 | BRUNDAGE Nevan | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
32 | CHEN Brian | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
33 | BERNARD Jack B. | V V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
34 | LEE JoonWon | V D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
34 | SINGH Aryaman | D V D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
36 | HEADRICK Lance | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
37 | TIKHONOV Iliya | D D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
38 | LIN Harrison | D D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
39 | SNYDER Ari | D D D D V V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
40 | PENHOET Adrien E. | V V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
41 | POIST Wylie | V V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
42 | GRENKE Wyatt | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
43 | CIGLIANO Benjamin I. | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
45 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
46 | ZHANG Andy | V V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
47 | LAM Alan | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
48 | FU Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
49 | TIKHONOV Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
50 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
51 | SELLAR Ian | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | CHUNG Andrew | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
53 | JONES Colin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
54 | MORAN Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
54 | AMOLSCH Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
56 | RUIZ Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.