ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | V D V V D V | V V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LIEF Isaac R. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | GAO Daniel | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 5 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 7 | MAHESH Tarun | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 8 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | PARK Frederick | V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | MORSE Tyler | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | WIECHMANN Colin | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | SHEN Max | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 13 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | JUN Jaywu | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 15 | KOBI Samuel | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | WU Joseph | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 17 | AGAON Shawn | V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | V V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ROSENBERG Jacob | D V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 20 | MISHIMA Torata | V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | ROLLO Emmett H. | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | RICHARD Owen | D D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 23 | GONG Haixiang | V D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 25 | GORTI Agustya | V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | V D D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 27 | STABB Xuan | V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | SERAFIN Ben | D V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | AGAON Ethan | D D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 31 | SUN James H. | D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | DISIMONE David Z. | D D D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 33 | WADE Grayson | D V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 34 | SUN Jason | V V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 35 | MORTON William | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 36 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 37 | WU Jonathan | D V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 38 | CHEN Jun Ho | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 39 | XIE Brandon | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 40 | HU Anton | V D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 41 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | V D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | PAN Tristan | D D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 43 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 44 | KUMAR Aidan | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 44 | SUN Jeffery | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 46 | BEAUCHESNE Rudy | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 47 | RIVERA Louis | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 48 | PERSAUD Daivik | D D D D D V | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 49 | ZOU Xianyang | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 50 | REDDY Arya | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | HU Robert J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 52 | STELTENKAMP Neal | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.