Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
2 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
3 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
5 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
6 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
7 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
8 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
9 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
10 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% |
11 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
12 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
13 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
14 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
15 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
16 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
17 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
18 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
19 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
20 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
21 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
22 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
23 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
24 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
25 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
26 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 10% | |
27 | GRASS Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
28 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
29 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
30 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
31 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
32 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
33 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
34 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
35 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
36 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
37 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | < 1% | - |
38 | LIN Michael | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
39 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
40 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
41 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
43 | WUJASTYK Leon | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
45 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
46 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
48 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
49 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% |
49 | LI Arvin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
52 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
53 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
54 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
55 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
56 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
57 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
58 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
59 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
60 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
61 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
62 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | - |
64 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 94% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - |
65 | YOON Dylan | 100% | 100% | 84% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
67 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
68 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
70 | GUO Justin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
71 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
72 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
73 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
74 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
75 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 4% | |
76 | WU Michael | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
77 | XU Ethan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
78 | LI Aaron | 100% | 97% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
79 | ROBINS Brennan | 100% | 84% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
81 | AMRANI David | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
82 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
83 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
84 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
85 | LI Ayren | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
86 | PETERSON Dale | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
86 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
88 | LEUNG Jin | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
89 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
89 | LI Toby | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
91 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
92 | HARRIS Noah | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
93 | HAYLON Caleb | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
94 | TRAUB William | 100% | 15% | - | - | - | - | - |
95 | OLLARI John W. | 100% | 22% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.