Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
2 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 47% | 21% | |
3 | GAO Daniel | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | MANN JAKEROD | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% | |
5 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
6 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
7 | SHA Michael | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
8 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
9 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
10 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
11 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
12 | LAI Aedin | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
13 | LACROIX Floryan | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 25% | |
14 | HU Lucas | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
15 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
16 | PRIHODKO Max | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
17 | LAI Boden | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
18 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
19 | BEALS Alden | 1% | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
20 | SINGH Jaysukh | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
21 | WONG Maximus | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | TREBON Hayden | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
23 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
24 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% | |
25 | BADEA Christian | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | HU Anton | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
27 | XIE Brandon | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
28 | ZHANG Shawn | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
29 | WANG Justin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | ZHANG William | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
31 | BRADSHAW Carter | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
32 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
33 | JIANG Ryan | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
33 | DOYON - VERDON William | - | - | 9% | 39% | 40% | 12% | |
35 | OSTIGUY Cameron | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
36 | ZHAO Zidong | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | ZHAO Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
38 | CAUCHY Eliot | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
39 | PAN Anthony | 11% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
40 | XIA Dashan | 3% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
41 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
42 | MATEI Daniel | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
43 | TRULL A.J. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
44 | NUTOVYCH David | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% | |
45 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
46 | GOON Tristan Yang | - | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | LEIBOWITZ Ryan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
48 | SHONEMAN Sam | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
49 | WU Chi Kuan | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | JIANG Matthew | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
52 | SONG Troy | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
53 | ZHANG Roland | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
54 | ZHONG Lee | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
55 | WONG King-Yee | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
56 | ZHANG Dinghao | 1% | 14% | 55% | 26% | 4% | - | |
57 | GRAYSON Joshua | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
58 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
59 | SONG Changze | 33% | 56% | 10% | - | - | - | |
60 | ZHAO Haoran David | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
61 | FEINBERG James Y. | 31% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
62 | YAO Jack | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
63 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
64 | SAVORETTI Pietro | < 1% | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
65 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
66 | YIN Chujun | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
67 | TESFAYE Elias | 19% | 58% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
68 | LIN Zizhen | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
69 | WANG HANZHANG | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
70 | XU Che | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
71 | DOWD Peter L. | 6% | 51% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
72 | MEN Junda | - | 3% | 25% | 46% | 22% | 3% | |
73 | THOMPSON Ian | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
74 | WOLFORD Benjamin | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
75 | HOWARD Jackson | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
76 | KRALICEK Emmet | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
77 | LIU Adam | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
78 | MASSE Jack | 9% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
79 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
79 | WHITE Aidan | 65% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
81 | MASSE Dean | 85% | 14% | - | - | - | - | - |
82 | PTASZEK Al | 51% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.