Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | MANZ Hamilton R. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 3 | KING Cameron | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | WIMMER Chandler M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | KIM Edward J. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | LEE Shwan | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 11 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | MISHIMA Torata | V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 13 | MIN MARCUS | D D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | CHEN Eric | V D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | RAWSON Nicholas | D V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | WHITMORE James C. | D D V V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | JANG Elliot | V V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 18 | JIN daniel | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | KIM Prestin | V D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 20 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | V D V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 21 | CAO Albert | D V D V V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 22 | FU Ethan | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | V V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ILYAS Zakariya | D V D D V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 25 | MURPHY Thomas P. | V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 26 | PARK Frederick | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | ZHANG Andy | V D D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | MARGHUB Safi | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | TREBON Hayden | D D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | CAO Brad | D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | KOTCHEN Peter Trammell | D D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | CHO Hyunseong | D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 33 | GEHRKE Nate | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 34 | STANCILL Hunter G. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | SHARMA Om V. | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | SHOUSHA Yassin | D D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 37 | MORAN Joseph | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | AKOCS Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 40 | DURINGTON Wyatt S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.