Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
2 | MANZ Hamilton R. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
3 | KING Cameron | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
5 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
6 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
7 | KIM Edward J. | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 44% | 15% | |
8 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
9 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
10 | LEE Shwan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
11 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
12 | MISHIMA Torata | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
13 | MIN MARCUS | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
14 | CHEN Eric | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
15 | RAWSON Nicholas | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
16 | WHITMORE James C. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | JANG Elliot | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | JIN daniel | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
19 | KIM Prestin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
20 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
21 | CAO Albert | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
22 | FU Ethan | 3% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
23 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
24 | ILYAS Zakariya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
25 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
26 | PARK Frederick | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
27 | ZHANG Andy | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
28 | MARGHUB Safi | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
29 | TREBON Hayden | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
30 | CAO Brad | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | KOTCHEN Peter Trammell | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
32 | CHO Hyunseong | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | GEHRKE Nate | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
34 | STANCILL Hunter G. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
35 | SHARMA Om V. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | SHOUSHA Yassin | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
37 | MORAN Joseph | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
39 | AKOCS Ethan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
40 | DURINGTON Wyatt S. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.