Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | MANZ Hamilton R. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 3 | KING Cameron | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | WIMMER Chandler M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | KIM Edward J. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | LEE Shwan | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 11 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | MISHIMA Torata | V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 13 | MIN MARCUS | D D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | CHEN Eric | V D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | RAWSON Nicholas | D V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | WHITMORE James C. | D D V V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | JANG Elliot | V V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 18 | JIN daniel | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | KIM Prestin | V D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 20 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | V D V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 21 | CAO Albert | D V D V V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 22 | FU Ethan | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | V V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ILYAS Zakariya | D V D D V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 25 | MURPHY Thomas P. | V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 26 | PARK Frederick | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | ZHANG Andy | V D D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | MARGHUB Safi | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | TREBON Hayden | D D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | CAO Brad | D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | KOTCHEN Peter Trammell | D D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | CHO Hyunseong | D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 33 | GEHRKE Nate | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 34 | STANCILL Hunter G. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | SHARMA Om V. | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | SHOUSHA Yassin | D D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 37 | MORAN Joseph | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | AKOCS Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 40 | DURINGTON Wyatt S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.