NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
2 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
3 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
3 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
5 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 30% |
6 | LEE Stewart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
7 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
8 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
9 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% |
10 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | - |
11 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
12 | SETO Jing | 100% | 99% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | ||
14 | BEDOR William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
15 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
16 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
17 | SANDERS Ian W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
18 | CARPENTER Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
19 | ZHANG William | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% | ||
20 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | ||
22 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
23 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
24 | SUN Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
25 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
26 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
27 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
27 | UNG Kai | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
29 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
30 | ZEBROSE Cordell B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 8% |
31 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
32 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
33 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | < 1% |
34 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
35 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
36 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
37 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
38 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 3% |
40 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
41 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 23% |
42 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
43 | LIU Adam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
44 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% | |
45 | NABAVI Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
46 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
47 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
49 | MEN Junda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
50 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
51 | WU Colin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
52 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
53 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
55 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
56 | AYALA Jaime | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
57 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
58 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
59 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
61 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 91% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
62 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
63 | PAQUET Mathieu | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
64 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
65 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
66 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
68 | STEVENSON Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
69 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
70 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
71 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
72 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
73 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
74 | GREEN Noah J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
75 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
76 | ZHANG Dinghao | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
77 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
78 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
79 | LENAR David | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
80 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
81 | PEDICONE Joseph | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
82 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | ||
83 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
84 | JIANG ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
85 | SOSNICK Samuel | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
85 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
87 | HSIEN Hong-yu | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
88 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
89 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
90 | WARD Carrington R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
91 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | ||
92 | WANG Zhenhai | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
92 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
94 | ALAM Rajan | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.