December SJCC + Division 1 NAC

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
2 TIYA BIAYA K. - - 1% 9% 28% 42% 20%
3 PO Oliver - - - 6% 26% 44% 24%
3 BING Charles - - 5% 23% 45% 27%
5 TRAUGOT Owen G. - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
6 DIERKS Kian - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
7 JAIN Aditya - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
8 LU Yikai - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
9 KLOTZ Isaiah - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
10 SONG Aiden S. - - - 1% 8% 36% 56%
11 DESHMUKH Arjun - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
12 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - 3% 19% 46% 31%
13 LIN James G. - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
14 GERVAIS Joel - - 5% 24% 45% 26%
15 CO Dylan - - 1% 9% 32% 41% 17%
16 SIMA Congyu Josh - 2% 11% 31% 35% 18% 3%
17 SONG Leonardo T. - - - - 5% 31% 63%
18 GUO Justin - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
19 DEGROOT Blake - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
20 LEE Chris - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 25%
21 LI Matthew - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
22 LEE Jacob - - 1% 10% 30% 41% 18%
23 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
24 QIAN Jason H. - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
25 TANG Owen S. - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
26 KRYLTSOV Michael - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 8%
27 MIALL Steven A. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 23%
28 LI Arvin - 2% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
29 CHEN Kyle P. 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
30 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen 1% 24% 40% 26% 8% 1%
31 FORTUNE Alexander J. - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
32 REYES Omar - - 5% 23% 38% 27% 7%
33 MATSAKH Philip - - 3% 13% 33% 37% 13%
34 KNIZHNIK David - - - 3% 16% 41% 40%
35 HUTH Mitchell - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
35 TAN Aidan - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 1%
37 LI Eric - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
38 WONG Adrian - - 5% 24% 43% 28%
39 DAVIDSON Elliot - - 6% 25% 41% 25% 3%
40 MILLER Aidan A. - 3% 14% 31% 34% 16% 2%
41 MOHAMED Amir - - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13%
42 KEE Andrew L. - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 14%
43 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - - 4% 20% 39% 29% 7%
43 NGUYEN Martin - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 4%
45 PARRISH Evan 2% 13% 33% 33% 16% 3% -
46 SICHITIU Alexander - - 4% 21% 47% 28%
47 RASMUSSEN Sage 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
48 ZHAO Adam - 7% 34% 41% 16% 2%
49 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 2% 14% 34% 36% 14%
50 YOON DYLAN - 6% 24% 38% 26% 7%
51 LANG Dong Lin - - 4% 18% 37% 33% 8%
52 JIANG Owen - - 2% 17% 40% 32% 8%
53 WANG Winston - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
54 CHENG Jonathan - 5% 22% 37% 28% 7%
55 LING Eddie - 3% 18% 38% 32% 9%
56 ZHANG Aaron - 6% 32% 42% 17% 2%
57 HE Patrick - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
58 HAN Changhee - 6% 24% 38% 26% 6%
59 LE Jacob H. 15% 45% 30% 8% 1% -
60 GATZA Logan - 4% 21% 38% 29% 8%
61 SENIC Lucas 1% 12% 34% 37% 15% 1%
62 FUKUDA Diego 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
63 WU DING-JUN - 1% 10% 36% 37% 14% 2%
64 FEDONCHIK Henry J. - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
65 NAGER Noah - - 2% 10% 31% 40% 17%
66 CULLIVAN Justice - - - 4% 26% 70%
67 ROSE Ben - - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
68 PYO Michael M. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
69 JIANG Bowang 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
70 LI Samuel - 5% 29% 39% 21% 5% -
71 YAO Bradley - 3% 13% 32% 35% 15% 2%
72 DOCTOR Aidan L. - - 7% 31% 45% 17%
73 ORR Spencer - 4% 20% 37% 30% 9%
73 VALOUEV Aleksey - 3% 17% 36% 33% 11%
75 SAGE Michael P. - 5% 25% 40% 25% 5%
76 DINSAY Kristjan - - 5% 22% 41% 27% 4%
77 XU Andy P. - 4% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
78 EDISON Ansel 1% 10% 33% 37% 16% 3% -
79 DORAN Wesley C. - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
80 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
81 CHENG Nathan - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
82 MCISAAC Finn 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
83 KIM Minhyeok - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
84 BADLANI Dev - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
85 SHIN Joshua J. - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
86 DETERING Julian - - 1% 13% 43% 43%
87 ZHEN Ethan 2% 20% 39% 30% 9% 1%
88 WU Alber Y. - 3% 21% 40% 29% 6%
89 GAO William - 2% 16% 36% 34% 11%
89 GUTH Joseph 4% 28% 39% 22% 6% 1%
91 LIGOS Alex M. 4% 22% 40% 27% 7% 1%
91 KIM Brian 11% 41% 36% 11% 1% -
93 CORTRIGHT Skipper 1% 12% 33% 37% 16% 1%
93 LI Aaron - 5% 25% 41% 25% 4%
95 SONG Austin 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2%
95 RAJ Jay 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
97 PAN Henry 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
98 ELKOUSY Laith H. - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
99 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
100 WU Trevor - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
101 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
102 NICOLETTI Luca - 1% 11% 35% 37% 14% 1%
103 PARK Jason B. - - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
103 LEE Eugene 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
105 CHENG Ethan - 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
105 MARTIN Darius 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
107 AKYAMAC Bora - 3% 13% 31% 34% 16% 2%
108 MOHAMED Murad - - 4% 23% 41% 27% 4%
108 YAP Nathan 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
110 WONG Antonio - 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
111 MA Bryant - 4% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
112 HUANG Eythan - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
113 FENG Michael 7% 31% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
114 HE Kyle 2% 20% 38% 29% 10% 2% -
115 LIU Ethan - 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
116 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2%
117 EDWARDS Maxon 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
118 GOGOI Vir K. 2% 14% 35% 35% 12% 1%
119 LEE Jonah - 2% 14% 36% 35% 12%
120 GATRELL Mitchell E. 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
121 XIE Buster 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% -
122 ALONSO Vinicius - 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
123 XU Ethan 4% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
124 AHN Jun - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
125 GAO Payton 2% 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
126 SUAREZ Adrian 7% 28% 40% 21% 4% -
127 VANOYEN Dominick 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
128 MOORHOUSE Emmett 48% 40% 11% 1% - -
129 LOVE Aaron - 1% 8% 33% 45% 13%
130 TANG Albert - 6% 26% 44% 22% 3%
131 JURMAN Therin 22% 50% 24% 4% - - -
132 QIU Zhaocheng 7% 37% 38% 15% 3% - -
133 LIN Michael - - 4% 22% 41% 28% 5%
134 MAO Lucas 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
135 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - 1% 6% 23% 39% 26% 4%
136 LEE Brendan - 8% 29% 38% 21% 4%
137 BRAIZINHA Thomas 4% 42% 39% 13% 2% -
137 MA Andrew - 6% 28% 39% 22% 4%
137 TIKHAEV Alexander - 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
140 KLYCZEK Andrew - 7% 31% 40% 19% 3%
141 STRINGER David 1% 23% 41% 27% 8% 1%
142 SONG Noel 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
143 WANG Brian 2% 19% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
144 LEVY Jacob 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
144 YU William 28% 45% 22% 5% - - -
146 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
146 ORLOV Dmitriy 2% 15% 36% 32% 13% 2% -
148 XU Dinghui Ryan 46% 43% 11% 1% - - -
149 WILLIAMS Connor J. - 3% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
150 LORENZO Alejandro 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
151 DERRICK Blake - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
152 SMOLICH Marat 16% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
153 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 11% 46% 33% 9% 1% - -
154 GNEUHS Sam 4% 29% 48% 17% 2% - -
155 YU Stephen 42% 41% 15% 3% - - -
156 SHANNON Jack 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
157 PARK Rion 2% 18% 37% 31% 11% 2%
158 TANG Alexander L. 6% 40% 38% 14% 2% -
159 SHAO Eric 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
160 SHANKS Aidan T. 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% -
161 TANG August L. 1% 13% 35% 36% 14% 1%
162 WANG Mason 1% 17% 39% 32% 11% 1%
163 BAI Brian 31% 43% 21% 5% - -
164 SHENG Dalton 5% 28% 43% 20% 3% -
165 SEMP Iain 29% 43% 23% 5% - -
166 KRAMER Ryan 42% 46% 11% 1% - -
167 SUN Ryan 8% 37% 38% 15% 2% - -
168 SHAPIRO Leon 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
169 ZAIDI Adil 18% 57% 21% 3% - - -
170 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
171 CLARK Benjamin 12% 48% 34% 6% - - -
172 YANG Dylan 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
173 NICOLSON William 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
173 GRIEB Oliver 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
175 CHUANG Oscar 4% 24% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
175 GUEVARA Isaac 29% 45% 21% 4% - - -
177 SANTOS Carlos R. 3% 21% 46% 25% 5% - -
178 CHO Xzander 2% 31% 41% 21% 5% - -
179 ORNELAS Matteo 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
180 ZOU Michael 61% 34% 5% - - - -
181 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 1% 12% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
182 CHANG Nathan 66% 29% 5% - - -
183 MODADUGU Aryan 88% 12% 1% - - -
184 KOVACS Wyatt 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
185 BAE Eugene 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% -
186 VISHAWADIA Jaimin 32% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
187 MCKEE Calvin 76% 22% 2% - - -
188 TSAI Caleb 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
188 REEVES Liam < 1% 4% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2%
188 ZMUDA Aiden 64% 31% 4% - - - -
191 DHANOA Kian 88% 11% - - - -
191 HOLLIS Sean 66% 29% 5% - - -
193 MCCOWN Ronan 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
194 TAM Kyle 64% 30% 5% - - -
194 LIM Charlie 32% 51% 15% 2% - -
196 POWELL Sean 61% 33% 6% - - - -
196 NADOL Sam 65% 32% 3% - - - -
198 REAUME Nate 59% 34% 6% - - - -
199 KRZYWON Dylan 84% 15% 1% - - -
200 EGE Nathan 87% 13% 1% - - - -
201 KUE Temujin 47% 41% 11% 1% - -
202 PETROV Mikhail 57% 35% 8% 1% - - -
202 BLACK Zachary 23% 45% 25% 6% 1% - -
204 COSSROW Alex 76% 22% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.