The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | SARKAR Anish | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
3 | ANDERSON Kai | V V D V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
3 | CHEN Bailey | V D V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
5 | ZAYDMAN David M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | GENCHEV Madav | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
7 | CASTELLY Luke | V D V V D V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
8 | CHANG Andrew | D D V V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
9 | SEO Shawn | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
10 | JAIN Samyak | V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
11 | LEE Bryson | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
12 | DOWDELL Riley | V V V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
13 | LIU Noah | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | SIM Ian | V D V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
15 | JONES Caleb | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
16 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | D D V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V D V V | D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
18 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
18 | YUEN Nathan | V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
20 | MANA Arnav | D V V V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
21 | CLAES Thomas | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
22 | LAI Alexander | D D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
23 | TONG Samuel | V V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
24 | KNUDSEN Travis | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
25 | ZHUANG William | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
26 | RICHARD silas | V V D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
27 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | V V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
28 | WONG Preston | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
29 | NG Biwon | D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
30 | WONG Ethan | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
31 | WU Johnny y. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
32 | SARKAR Agniv | D D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
33 | ROBINSON Samuel | V D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
34 | LEVENTAL Mark | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
35 | GUO Woody | D V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
36 | CHENG Trevor | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
37 | PLOSCARU Matthew | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
38 | LI Yunji (Rain) | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
39 | BHARGAV Angad | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
40 | HSU Joshua | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
41 | YAN Eric | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
42 | LIN Jason | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
43 | GADHVI Darius | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
44 | YOUNG Quentin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
45 | MITCHEM Paolo | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
46 | KIM Remington | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
47 | WEBB Jeremey | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.