The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
2 | SARKAR Anish | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
3 | ANDERSON Kai | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
3 | CHEN Bailey | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
5 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
6 | GENCHEV Madav | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
7 | CASTELLY Luke | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
8 | CHANG Andrew | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
9 | SEO Shawn | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 15% |
10 | JAIN Samyak | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
11 | LEE Bryson | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
12 | DOWDELL Riley | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
13 | LIU Noah | - | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
14 | SIM Ian | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
15 | JONES Caleb | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
16 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
18 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
18 | YUEN Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
20 | MANA Arnav | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
21 | CLAES Thomas | - | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
22 | LAI Alexander | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
23 | TONG Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
24 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
25 | ZHUANG William | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
26 | RICHARD silas | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
27 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
28 | WONG Preston | 9% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
29 | NG Biwon | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
30 | WONG Ethan | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
31 | WU Johnny y. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | SARKAR Agniv | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
33 | ROBINSON Samuel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
34 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
35 | GUO Woody | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
36 | CHENG Trevor | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
37 | PLOSCARU Matthew | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
38 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | BHARGAV Angad | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
40 | HSU Joshua | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | YAN Eric | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | LIN Jason | 35% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | GADHVI Darius | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | YOUNG Quentin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | MITCHEM Paolo | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
46 | KIM Remington | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
47 | WEBB Jeremey | 43% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.