Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 3 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 5 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 15% |
| 6 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 7 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 8 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
| 9 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
| 10 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 11 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 12 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 13 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 14 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 15 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 16 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 17 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 19 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 20 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 22 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 24 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 27 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 28 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 29 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
| 31 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% | |
| 35 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 36 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
| 37 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | YU Samuel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 40 | DAN Rex | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 41 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 42 | LIN Zizhen | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | SZIEDE Kieran | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | < 1% | - | - |
| 44 | MORTIMER Gavin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 45 | ABBOUD Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 46 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 47 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 49 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 96% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 51 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 52 | LAPP Oliver | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 53 | HULL Liam | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 54 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | WALLACE James | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 56 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 57 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 59 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 60 | CARNALL Hunter | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 61 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 62 | HAN Sam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | METZLER Calder | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 70 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 72 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 74 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | PENG Yue | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 78 | YAO Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | YI Nathan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 80 | MANITT Philip | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | EVANS George | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 83 | HECHT Chance | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | DONNELLY Enzo | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 86 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | MACTOUGH Ben | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.