The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BIDA Sergey | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 2 | FU Leon | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 3 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 3 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 5 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 71% | |
| 6 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 7 | SOULAIRE Tom | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | WESTPHAL David R. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% | |
| 9 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 10 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 12 | COHEN Benjamin A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | HEINS Dylan | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 14 | LIU Noah | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | NG Biwon | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | UVAROV Andrii | 2% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHOI Zachary | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 18 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% | |
| 19 | CHANG Andrew | 14% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SARKAR Agniv | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | HE Zhiheng | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | - |
| 22 | WONG Preston | 10% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | WELDON Benjamin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | ANDERSON Kai | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 26 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 28 | CAMPBELL-KRUGER Adam W. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | - |
| 28 | SEO Shawn | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Derek | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 31 | GU Aidan | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | TANG William | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 33 | SIM Ian | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE Bryson | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | LEE Jayden J. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LUONG Allen | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | MING Nathan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | MA Victor | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 9% | |
| 40 | YU Austin | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 43 | SARKAR Anish | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 44 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 45 | MANA Arnav | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 47 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 25% | 1% |
| 47 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% | |
| 50 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 51 | KNUDSEN Travis | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 52 | CLAES Thomas | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | PERALTA Christian | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | DOWDELL Riley | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 56 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 6% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | MARIANI Lou | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 5% | |
| 58 | SIRBU Dan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | SODHI Jaco | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 20% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | YUEN Nathan | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PRAKASH Hari | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LIU Aaron | 56% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | BUERGISSER Kai | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LIU Benjamin | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | SITTER Gregoire | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 67 | LI Ethan R. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 68 | HSU Joshua | 12% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | SLOAN Ryan | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | LIPTON Michael D. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 71 | GUO Woody | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | LAI Alexander | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.