The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BIDA Sergey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% |
| 2 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 3 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 3 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 5 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | |
| 6 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 7 | SOULAIRE Tom | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 9 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 10 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 12 | COHEN Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 13 | HEINS Dylan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 14 | LIU Noah | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | NG Biwon | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | UVAROV Andrii | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 18 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% | |
| 19 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | - |
| 22 | WONG Preston | 100% | 90% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 24 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 26 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 27 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 28 | CAMPBELL-KRUGER Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 16% | - |
| 28 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 31 | GU Aidan | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | TANG William | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 33 | SIM Ian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | MING Nathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% | |
| 40 | YU Austin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 43 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 44 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 45 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 47 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | 1% |
| 47 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 11% | |
| 50 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 51 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 52 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 56 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 5% | |
| 58 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 59 | SODHI Jaco | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 59 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LIU Benjamin | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | SITTER Gregoire | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 67 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 68 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | SLOAN Ryan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | GUO Woody | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.