Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GAO Daniel | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
2 | CHEN Leonardo | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
3 | MAO Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
3 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
5 | DOYON - VERDON William | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
6 | AGAON Shawn | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 48% | 37% |
7 | AGAON Ethan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
8 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
9 | KNOX James | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% |
10 | HE Lawrence | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
11 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 23% |
12 | LI Zachary | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
13 | MANN JAKEROD | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
14 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
15 | LIU Adam | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
16 | DAN Rex | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
17 | STELTENKAMP Neal | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
18 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
19 | ZHAO Zidong | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
20 | BEALS Alden | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
21 | SONG Troy | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
22 | REPIC Oliver | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
23 | GOON Tristan Yang | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | PAN Tristan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
25 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
26 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 8% |
27 | ZHANG William | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
28 | CHAI Ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
29 | HU Anton | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
30 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% | |
31 | UPSHAW Micah | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
32 | YU Samuel | 2% | 18% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | LEE Stewart S. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 35% |
34 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
35 | JIANG ryan | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
36 | WONG King-Yee | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
37 | HU Robert J. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
38 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
39 | HOWARD Jackson | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | ZHANG Roland | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
41 | ZENG Andrew | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
43 | KWON Aaron | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
44 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
45 | PAN Anthony | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
46 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
47 | NILSEN Mark | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
48 | SUN Lucas | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
49 | DUKO Phillip | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
50 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | GLUSHKOV David | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
52 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
54 | CHEN Jun Ho | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
55 | RIM Eugene | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
56 | WANG Tony | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | LEE Wyatt | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 22% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | MANITT Philip | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | ALAM Rajan | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | TESFAYE Elias | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | TANG Charles | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
63 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
64 | SHONEMAN Sam | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
65 | THOMPSON Ian | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
66 | YAO Andrew | 12% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.