The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Morris Cup RYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, April 7, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GOHEL Dayus T. - - - - 3% 25% 71%
2 XIA Dashan - 4% 16% 33% 34% 14%
3 MAO Benjamin - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
3 MANN JAKEROD - - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
5 RICHARD Owen - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
6 SVERDLOV Seth - - 1% 8% 29% 46% 17%
7 WU Jonathan - - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
8 REPIC Oliver 3% 20% 36% 29% 10% 2% -
9 KOKENGE Reid - - - 2% 12% 39% 48%
10 WANG justin - 1% 10% 31% 41% 16%
11 TRAN Spencer 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1%
12 KOYFMAN Benjamin - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
13 DURKIN Brian - 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
14 ZHANG William - 1% 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
15 KARIMOV Amir 1% 7% 25% 37% 23% 6% -
16 CAO Ray 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1%
17 LONGSTREET Jeffrey - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
18 ZHAO Zidong - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
19 KRISHNAN Skanda - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 4%
20 KNOX James - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
21 LAI Aedin - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
22 SONG Troy - - 5% 23% 41% 27% 3%
22 PAN Tristan - 1% 5% 22% 39% 28% 5%
24 PARK Frederick - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
25 CHEN Allen 4% 20% 37% 28% 10% 1% -
26 DOUBOV Andrew - 3% 16% 37% 32% 10% 1%
27 MEN Junda - 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
28 LEE Aiden - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 2%
29 CHUNG Joshua - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
30 SUBRAMANIAM Sahil 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
31 WU Colin 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 1%
32 XIE Brandon - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
33 BOUDREAUX James - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
34 GALLANT Antoine - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
35 LAI Boden - 1% 6% 23% 40% 25% 5%
36 NILSEN Mark 2% 20% 38% 28% 10% 2% -
37 YU Samuel 2% 15% 34% 34% 13% 2% -
38 CHEN Luowen 1% 10% 35% 36% 15% 2% -
39 SUN Jason - - 3% 18% 39% 33% 7%
40 MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
41 CHEN ANDREW 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
42 KIM Tei D. - - 1% 7% 27% 44% 20%
43 HU Anton - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8% 1%
44 RATUSHNYI Georgii 6% 29% 39% 21% 5% -
45 OKUN Benjamin 13% 35% 35% 15% 2% -
46 TU Jinqi 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
47 KUGLER Luke - 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 3%
48 REDDY Arya - 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
48 WANG Xiangdong 3% 17% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
50 DUKO Phillip 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
51 SETO Jing - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11% 1%
52 BEGIN Nathan 3% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
53 YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki 2% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
54 KHANNA Nikhil - - 3% 18% 43% 34%
55 ZOGRAFOS Nicholas 39% 42% 16% 3% - -
56 LIU Jeremiah W. - 3% 14% 32% 33% 15% 3%
57 HIGGASON Hugh 8% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
58 BUIKEVICH Ihnat 25% 43% 25% 7% 1% - -
59 LIU Adam - 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 3%
60 ZOU Xianyang (Max) - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
61 SUN Jeffrey - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 1%
62 WEHMEYER Devin 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
63 ORESKOVIC Olivier 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
64 HIGGINS Jett 3% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1% -
65 GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
66 HU Robert J. - - 3% 16% 34% 34% 13%
67 KRUPENKO Gael 3% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
68 WANG Max S 1% 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
69 XIAN Andy 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 3% -
70 FUSSMAN Yuval 2% 11% 28% 34% 21% 5%
71 WONG King-Yee 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
72 BRADSHAW Carter 5% 21% 34% 28% 11% 2%
73 TORRES Gianni 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1%
74 WU Chi Kuan 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
75 HOWELL Liam 57% 35% 7% 1% - - -
76 WELIWATTA kenula 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
77 BHARGAVA Vivaan 14% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
77 LIN Nathan - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
79 RVACHEV Michael 8% 44% 36% 11% 1% - -
80 DURKIN Tristan E. 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
81 MCMILLAN Jackson V. 12% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
82 RIM Eugene 1% 17% 37% 30% 12% 2% -
83 BOURDEAU Zachary 1% 6% 23% 37% 27% 6% -
84 KWON Aaron 3% 24% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
85 NALLICHERI Ayaan 21% 47% 26% 6% 1% - -
86 ALAM Rajan 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
87 LI Jaden 71% 25% 3% - - - -
88 JOEL Irenov 70% 26% 3% - - - -
88 YANG Alex 8% 30% 37% 19% 5% - -
90 KIM Samuel 41% 43% 14% 2% - - -
91 YAO Andrew 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
92 MANITT Philip 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
93 KAPLAN Maddox 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
94 PAN Anthony 14% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
95 COLÓN Atum 14% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.