Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
2 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | |
3 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
3 | MANN JAKEROD | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
5 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
6 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 17% |
7 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
8 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
10 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% | |
11 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
12 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
13 | DURKIN Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
14 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
15 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
16 | CAO Ray | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
18 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
19 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
20 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
21 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
22 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 3% |
22 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
24 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
25 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
27 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
28 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
29 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
30 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
31 | WU Colin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
32 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
33 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
34 | GALLANT Antoine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
35 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
36 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | YU Samuel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | CHEN Luowen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
39 | SUN Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 7% |
40 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
41 | CHEN ANDREW | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
42 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
43 | HU Anton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
44 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
45 | OKUN Benjamin | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
46 | TU Jinqi | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
47 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
48 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
48 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
50 | DUKO Phillip | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
51 | SETO Jing | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
52 | BEGIN Nathan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
54 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
55 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
57 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
58 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
60 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
61 | SUN Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
62 | WEHMEYER Devin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
63 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
64 | HIGGINS Jett | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
65 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
66 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
67 | KRUPENKO Gael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
68 | WANG Max S | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
69 | XIAN Andy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
70 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
71 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
72 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | |
73 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
74 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
75 | HOWELL Liam | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | WELIWATTA kenula | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
77 | BHARGAVA Vivaan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
77 | LIN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
79 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 92% | 48% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
80 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
81 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
82 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
83 | BOURDEAU Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
84 | KWON Aaron | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
85 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 79% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
86 | ALAM Rajan | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
87 | LI Jaden | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
88 | JOEL Irenov | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
88 | YANG Alex | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
90 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
91 | YAO Andrew | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
92 | MANITT Philip | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
93 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
94 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
95 | COLÓN Atum | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.