Brockport, NY - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 2 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% |
| 3 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 5 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
| 6 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 7 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 8 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
| 9 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 10 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 11 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 8% | |
| 12 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% |
| 13 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 14 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 15 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 17 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 18 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 19 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 20 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 21 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 22 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 26 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 27 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 28 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | YANG Luao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 31 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | WU Jerry | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 36 | LI Eric | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | FU Yifan | 100% | 95% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | HONG Issac | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 42 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 85% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | TAN Connor | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 48 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | PO Oliver | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | DING Tom Zitong | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | CHEN Derek | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHAN Justin D. | 100% | 85% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | SOLDATOV Faddey | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.