Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | KHANNA Nikhil | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
3 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
5 | SU Caleb | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
7 | GREGSTON Layland | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
8 | KIM Nathan | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
9 | SHCHUR Landon | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
10 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
11 | LOISEAU Eliott | V V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
12 | SKORUPAN Grant | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
13 | RICHARDS Colin W. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | FANG Hanning | D V V D V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
15 | MENDOZA Zander | D D V V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
16 | SAUNIER Cameron | D D D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
17 | DODIN David | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
19 | LO Jake | V V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | WONG Adrian | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
23 | GUO ZIXU | V V V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
24 | WANG zhixing(Danile) | D V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
25 | JIANG Matthew | D V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
26 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | D D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
27 | BANSAL Arjun | V V V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
28 | SHOUSHA Hamza | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
29 | ZHANG Yuelin | V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
30 | CHIN Dylan A. | V D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
31 | PARK Nicholas | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
32 | ZHANG Kingston | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
33 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V V V D V V | D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
34 | BRODSKY Julian | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
35 | ROMANOV Ethan | V V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
37 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
38 | JONES Reilly | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
39 | STANTIAL Grant | D V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
41 | ZHANG Michael | V D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
41 | LEWIS Jonathan | D D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
43 | RIPA Joseph K. | V V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
44 | PAN Tristan | D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
45 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
46 | YU Austin | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
47 | KIM Jayden | V D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
48 | HU Anton | V D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
49 | KENT V David | V D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
50 | CHAI Ethan | D V D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
50 | LI Zachary | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
52 | BUERGISSER Tae | V D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
53 | CHUNG Michael | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
54 | MAO Lucas | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
55 | CAMP Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
56 | GINZBURG Adam | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
57 | ZHAI Avalo | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
58 | LEE John | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
59 | FARBER Ian S. | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
59 | MAXU Tiger | D D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
61 | ALI Farhan | D D D D V D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
62 | WOLFE Alex | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
63 | BUHEIS Lucas I. | D D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
64 | CHEN Zhengyang | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
65 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
66 | HUANG Yidong Allen | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
67 | FANG SHUOMING | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
68 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.