Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% |
| 3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 3 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 5 | SU Caleb | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% |
| 6 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 7 | GREGSTON Layland | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 8 | KIM Nathan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 9 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
| 10 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | LOISEAU Eliott | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 12 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 13 | RICHARDS Colin W. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | FANG Hanning | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | MENDOZA Zander | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 16 | SAUNIER Cameron | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | DODIN David | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 18 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | LO Jake | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | WONG Adrian | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% |
| 23 | GUO ZIXU | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 24 | WANG zhixing（Danile） | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | JIANG Matthew | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 27 | BANSAL Arjun | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | SHOUSHA Hamza | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 29 | ZHANG Yuelin | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% | |
| 30 | CHIN Dylan A. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | PARK Nicholas | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Kingston | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 34 | BRODSKY Julian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 35 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | JONES Reilly | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | STANTIAL Grant | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHANG Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 41 | LEWIS Jonathan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | RIPA Joseph K. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | PAN Tristan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 45 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | YU Austin | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KIM Jayden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | HU Anton | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | KENT V David | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHAI Ethan | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LI Zachary | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BUERGISSER Tae | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CHUNG Michael | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | MAO Lucas | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | CAMP Ethan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | GINZBURG Adam | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 57 | ZHAI Avalo | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LEE John | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | FARBER Ian S. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MAXU Tiger | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ALI Farhan | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | WOLFE Alex | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | BUHEIS Lucas I. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHEN Zhengyang | 8% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 66 | HUANG Yidong Allen | 11% | 47% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | FANG SHUOMING | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.