Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 53% |
| 3 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 5 | CATINO Brennen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 6 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
| 7 | LEE Aidan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 8 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 9 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 53% | 21% |
| 11 | PO Oliver | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 13 | LEE Jacob J | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 15 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 16 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 17 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 18 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 25% | 3% |
| 19 | TANG August L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 3% |
| 21 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 22 | LI Jinghua E. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 24 | GUO Justin | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MATSAKH Philip | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | SONG Austin | 1% | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
| 29 | LI Matthew | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | XIANG Derrick | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | LIN Michael | - | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | TANG Albert | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | HUTH Trevor | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 5% |
| 36 | KOKE Matthew C. | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Alex | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | STONE Adam | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | METTAPALLI Tarun | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Winston | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | TAN Aidan | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | HUANG Eythan | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 43 | SIMON Luke | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | CHO Ethan H. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 46 | ZHAO Adam | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ROSE Ben | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | MAO Lucas | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | QUINTERO Julian | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | SENIC Lucas | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WONG Jackson | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHIPMAN Andrew | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | PAN Henry | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | CAO Vincent | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | HIGGIN Matthew | 4% | 60% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | GONZALEZ ARRIETA Orlando Javier | 5% | 52% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | JONES Jackson | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | KOE Beckett | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | SELLERY William M. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | HOSANAGAR Ninad | 2% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.