Capitol Clash SYC & RCC with Non-Regional Veteran and Y8

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Niles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 41%
2 HELTON Noah 100% 100% 100% 95% 67% 22%
3 VITI Mark G. 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
3 XIAO Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
5 ZHANG Daniel D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52%
6 CHOUN Minwook (Sam) 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
7 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 26%
8 TUMMINGS C.J. 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
9 UM Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 43% 9%
10 LIN Richard W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 25%
11 YU Vinni 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
12 MORAIS Paulo 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 34%
13 REALS Alden D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 23%
14 HUTH Jacob 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 22% 3%
15 BRUK Peter J. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
16 ZHANG Yun Isaac 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 26% 4%
17 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
18 RINEHART Conner M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 24% 2%
19 LIMA Kevin M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
20 ZHANG Henry C. 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 4%
21 WALTER Evran M. 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% 1%
22 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 99% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
23 VASILIEV Sacha M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
24 LOCKWOOD Owen 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 17%
24 JANG Jaewon 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 23%
26 XIAO Enoch A. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 41% 10%
27 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
28 GEE Brandon 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 16%
29 CHEN Andrew 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
30 MARX Oscar L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 32%
31 KWON Ethan 100% 97% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
32 PAE Brian L. 100% 100% 98% 82% 46% 14% 2%
33 SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
34 CHOY Lucas B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 38%
35 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 81% 32%
36 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 46% 11%
37 MA Alexander 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 33%
38 CHENG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 15%
39 MCCORD Clark 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 40%
40 BREIER Matthew F. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 20% 2%
41 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
42 HUTH Mitchell 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 22% 3%
43 LI Jiaan 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
44 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
45 MUSHA John M. 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 23% 3%
45 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 32% 6%
47 CHAN Tyler 100% 99% 91% 65% 31% 8% 1%
48 YEROKHIN Michael N. 100% 100% 99% 92% 72% 38% 9%
49 PAULSON Connor M. 100% 100% 93% 64% 24% 4% -
50 MURRAY Maximo 100% 99% 88% 59% 25% 5% -
51 CHEN Allen 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 20% 2%
52 GRIFFITH JACK 100% 100% 99% 87% 40% 7%
53 BAS Liam 100% 99% 89% 61% 27% 6% 1%
54 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% 1%
55 PAE Jonathan L. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 44% 10%
56 MCCLAIN Bryce C. 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 34% 8%
57 BAE Junnie 100% 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 1%
58 MION Lorenzo 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 12%
59 FURST Matthew C. 100% 97% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
60 REZNICK Nicholas J. 100% 99% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
62 KITAGAWA Eric S. 100% 100% 95% 71% 33% 7% -
63 WILLIAMS Connor J. 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
64 GATZA Logan 100% 95% 72% 37% 12% 2% -
65 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2% -
66 GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 8%
67 GOLDER Will W. 100% 99% 89% 60% 26% 6% 1%
68 LI Yulei 100% 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 1%
69 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 99% 84% 48% 15% 2% -
70 ALONSOZANA Luke 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% -
71 GU Jeffrey 100% 99% 87% 38% 7% 1%
72 IVARSSON Oliver 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 14% 2%
73 GRISWOLD Abel B. 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 8% 1%
74 WEINKOPF William O. 100% 100% 96% 74% 33% 7% 1%
75 PYO Michael M. 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
76 ZHAO Jason L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 14%
77 GALLUCCI Charles John 100% 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% -
78 FU Yifan 100% 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2%
79 WEN George C. 100% 100% 98% 85% 56% 21% 3%
80 TIAN Aaron C. 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
81 GERVAIS Joel 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 10%
82 SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. 100% 98% 82% 45% 13% 2%
82 ZHAO Jesse 100% 89% 24% 2% - -
84 GISLER Benjamin B. 100% 84% 40% 6% - -
85 ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. 100% 99% 91% 62% 25% 5% -
86 KOBAL Maximilian 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
87 SZEGO Bence P. 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1% -
88 YIM Alex 100% 98% 68% 26% 5% - -
89 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 99% 87% 53% 18% 3% -
90 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 96% 75% 37% 10% 1% -
91 LOVIN Vlad 100% 77% 37% 10% 2% - -
92 FOTENOS Noah T. 100% 76% 26% 4% - - -
93 OH SEAN 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
94 DRESSEL Jet 100% 35% 5% - - - -
95 STRAYER Andrew 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 18% 3%
96 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 92% 55% 14%
96 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 7%
98 YU Jonathan J. 100% 83% 39% 6% - -
99 BELLUOMO David C. 100% 66% 20% 2% - -
100 BENDER Rhys T. 100% 82% 45% 14% 2% -
101 LEE Aidan 100% 96% 72% 35% 9% 1%
104 BUERGIN Aidan 100% 97% 78% 41% 13% 2% -
105 BRODERICK Padraig 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
105 WEDAM Rohan F. 100% 88% 52% 17% 3% - -
107 KLEIN Sebastian W. 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3% -
108 KEE Andrew L. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 2%
109 ZHANG Evan 100% 96% 75% 38% 10% 1% -
110 SYLVESTER William Z. 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% 1% -
111 CANO Diego A. 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 3% -
112 WANG Waley 100% 47% 11% 1% - - -
113 BEALE Asa G. 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
114 FORTUNE Alexander J. 100% 74% 26% 4% - - -
115 ROZENTAL Robert 100% 80% 42% 13% 2% - -
115 SICHITIU Alexander 100% 99% 82% 44% 12% 1% -
117 MCLENDON Diego 100% 21% 1% - - -
119 LIU Eric Y. 100% 48% 12% 2% - - -
120 JUSCINSKI Michal 100% 79% 29% 5% - - -
120 ROUNTREE Rob 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% 1% -
122 LI Bojun 100% 74% 30% 6% 1% - -
122 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 92% 54% 15% 2% - -
124 CAMACHO Miguel 100% 9% - - - - -
125 JONES Theodore M. 100% 94% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
125 MAHNKEN Thomas P. 100% 47% 5% - - - -
127 DAVIDSON Elliot 100% 73% 23% 3% - - -
129 HEISE Alexander D. 100% 75% 31% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.