Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 2 | FRAY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 3 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 5 | IMREK Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
| 7 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 9 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | |
| 10 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 11 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 13% | |
| 12 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 13 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 14 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 15 | SENNEWALD James J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | THOMAS Harris | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | NEAL John P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 19 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 20 | PANAYOTOV Alexander | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | GUNDA Saketh | 100% | 88% | 38% | 5% | - | - | |
| 22 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 23 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 24 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 27% | |
| 28 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 29 | SONG Alexander | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 99% | 73% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KARKI Salyan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | MONDALA Adrian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 23% | 4% |
| 38 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LARAWAY Hunter | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | SURESH NEERAJ | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 46 | SWOBODA Jonah | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 49 | OHAYON ROZANES Nimrod | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LO Jake | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | PATEL Avi S. | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.