Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
2 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 28% | |
3 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 17% | |
5 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
6 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
7 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
8 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
9 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
10 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
11 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
12 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
13 | KRIVAK Blaise | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
14 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
15 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
16 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | - |
17 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
18 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
19 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
20 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
21 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
22 | ZELTSER Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
23 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
25 | RACHAMIM Jonathan | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
26 | LURYE Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | HU Anton | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 80% | 30% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
31 | LI Lianhan | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
32 | LUR'YE Killian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | ROLAND Mackinley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% | |
34 | FARBER Ian S. | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | ZAPPA Bobby | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
37 | SICARD III Charles | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
38 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
39 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - |
41 | HUANG Logan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.