Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 3 | ZHAO kuncheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 3 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 5 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 6 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 31% |
| 7 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 8 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 9 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 9 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 11 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% |
| 12 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 13 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 14 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 15 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 16 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 17 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 18 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 19 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 20 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 7% |
| 22 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 23 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 24 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 25 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 27 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 28 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 30 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 10% |
| 31 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 34 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 35 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 36 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 37 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
| 38 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
| 39 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 40 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 41 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 42 | WANG Tony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 43 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 44 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 3% |
| 45 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | |
| 47 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 50 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 51 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 52 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | |
| 53 | KABA Elias | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 54 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 55 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | LI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | YANG Alex | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 61 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | HIGGINS Viktor | 100% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 66 | SONG Charlie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 67 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 68 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
| 69 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 70 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | LENNON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 72 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 73 | AU Joshua | 100% | 94% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 74 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 76 | WU Jerry | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | HU HAOYUE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 78 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 79 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 80 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 82 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 83 | BOUCHACOURT Arthur | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 84 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | HE Bronto | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 86 | YU David | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | EMMERT JP | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 88 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 89 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 90 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 91 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 92 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 93 | LEE Anton | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 94 | WARD Kofi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 95 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 97 | LI Morgan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 98 | GOVOROV Alexander | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 99 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 100 | LI Ray | 100% | 87% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 101 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 102 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 103 | HEISLER Maxfield | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | 89% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | NG Rygel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 107 | VAN DOREN William | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 108 | LI Tyrese | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 108 | ZHANG Marcus | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 110 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | MA Wilson | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | EFFRON Silas | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 113 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 116 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 117 | HOLCOMB Liam | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 117 | JOHNSON Lincoln | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 119 | KIM Zac | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 120 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 120 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | DU Yifan | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 122 | XIE Richard | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.