Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
2 | CHOI Jiwoo J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87% |
3 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
3 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
5 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% | |
6 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
7 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
8 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 45% | 3% |
9 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
10 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
11 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
12 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
12 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
14 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
15 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
16 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | |
17 | PAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
19 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 41% | 2% |
20 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
21 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
22 | VERSTEELE Sander | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
23 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
24 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
25 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
26 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
27 | HE Yuhao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
28 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
29 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
30 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 16% |
31 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
32 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
33 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
34 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 11% |
35 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
36 | QI Steve | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
37 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% |
39 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
40 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
41 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
42 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
43 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
44 | LOU Darren | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
45 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
46 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | |
47 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
47 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
49 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
49 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
51 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
52 | SHADPOOR Ryan | 100% | 99% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | LOUIE Timothy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
54 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
56 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
57 | FINN Mark T. | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
58 | YULDASHEV Timur | 100% | 98% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
61 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
62 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
63 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | |
64 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
65 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
66 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
67 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
68 | MCLENDON Diego | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
69 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 9% | - | - |
70 | SCHALES Peyton | 100% | 82% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
71 | LONGENBACH Pharell J. | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | LI Matthew | 100% | 98% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
74 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
75 | DREW Nicolas | 100% | 97% | 71% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
76 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
77 | LU Xiao | 100% | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 76% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
80 | ZHANG Huaxu | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
81 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
82 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
82 | THUMMALA Nishanth | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | RADTKE Jakob | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
85 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
87 | KANDADAI Arjun | 100% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
88 | LI Lianhao | 100% | 39% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
89 | DAS Nikhil | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
90 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 85% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
90 | DONG sean | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
93 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
94 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | 100% | 79% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | MECINSKI Henrik | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.