Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MULCAHY Olaf | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
2 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
3 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
3 | DODIN David | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% | |
5 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
6 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
7 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
8 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
9 | SU Caleb | - | - | 2% | 13% | 46% | 39% | |
10 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 27% | 70% |
11 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
12 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% | |
13 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
14 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
14 | ZHENG Andy | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
16 | BRODSKY Julian | - | - | 4% | 28% | 51% | 17% | |
17 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 35% | |
18 | SILVERS Ari | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
19 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
20 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% | |
21 | LO Jake | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
22 | BARG Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
23 | KIM Jayden | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
24 | KARAM Mateo | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
25 | XIE Brandon | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
26 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
27 | SAUNIER Cameron | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
28 | ZHANG Kingston | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
29 | TRULL A.J. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
30 | CHIN Dylan A. | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 2% | |
31 | LEE John | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
32 | KIM Brandon | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
33 | COPEN Elliot P. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | HAMZA Tudor | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
35 | KARNAS Karol | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
36 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
37 | CHEN Brian | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
38 | LAI Alexander | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 29% | |
39 | RICHARDS Colin W. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
40 | RAINEY Daniel | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
41 | REIERSON Risor | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
42 | CHEN Bailey | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 55% | 14% |
43 | RIPA Joseph K. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
44 | BANSAL Arjun | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
45 | SONG Troy | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | ALIYEV Maxsud | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | THOMAS Michael | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
48 | VRAPI Dorian A. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
49 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
50 | KRIVAK Blaise | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | - |
51 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
52 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
53 | WOLFE Alex | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
54 | CHUNG Michael | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
55 | YU Austin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
56 | ROLAND Mackinley | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
57 | YPHANTIDES George | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
58 | FARBER Ian S. | 22% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
60 | CHO Ethan H. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
61 | ZHENG Jerry | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | WANG William | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
63 | LEE inwoo | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
64 | CLICK Tristan | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
65 | JONES Reilly | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
66 | GREGSTON Layland | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
67 | KIM Jaden | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
68 | MAO Lucas | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
69 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% | - | |
70 | DONAHUE Lake | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
71 | VAN VACTER Thomas | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
72 | LI Tristan | 6% | 32% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
73 | BUHEIS Lucas I. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | ANDERSON Kai | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
75 | ALI Farhan | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | CHAO Nicholas | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
77 | LEE Aiden | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
78 | CAMP Ethan | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
78 | FRANGER Max | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
80 | CAMPION Hasan | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
81 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
82 | DHAL Leon | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
83 | GINZBURG Adam | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
84 | RAHMAN Yousef | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
85 | PARKER Isaiah | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
87 | OLSON Joseph | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
88 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo Antonio | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
89 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
90 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | BRADSHAW Carter | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
92 | PAN Anthony | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
93 | CHEN Bowen | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
94 | ZENG Andrew | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
96 | LEE Damien | 11% | 45% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
97 | JARONIK Raymond | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
98 | THOMPSON North D. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
99 | GATZA Jason | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
100 | BUERGISSER Tae | 4% | 27% | 49% | 19% | 2% | - | |
101 | CHOI Zachary | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
102 | FULLER Daniel | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
103 | KENT V David | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
104 | HERNDON Liam | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
105 | SIEDOW William | 58% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - | |
106 | ZELTSER Eric S. | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.