Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | |
2 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
3 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
3 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
5 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% |
6 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
7 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
8 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
9 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% | |
10 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 70% |
11 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 23% |
12 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
13 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
14 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
14 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 14% | 1% |
16 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 17% | |
17 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | |
18 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
19 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
20 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% | |
21 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
22 | BARG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
23 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
24 | KARAM Mateo | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
25 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
26 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 10% |
27 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
28 | ZHANG Kingston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
29 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
30 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% | 2% | |
31 | LEE John | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - | |
32 | KIM Brandon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
33 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
34 | HAMZA Tudor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
35 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
36 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
37 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
38 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% | |
39 | RICHARDS Colin W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% |
40 | RAINEY Daniel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
41 | REIERSON Risor | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
42 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 14% |
43 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | BANSAL Arjun | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | |
45 | SONG Troy | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
46 | ALIYEV Maxsud | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
48 | VRAPI Dorian A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
49 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
50 | KRIVAK Blaise | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | - |
51 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
52 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
53 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
54 | CHUNG Michael | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
55 | YU Austin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
56 | ROLAND Mackinley | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
57 | YPHANTIDES George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
58 | FARBER Ian S. | 100% | 78% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
60 | CHO Ethan H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
61 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
62 | WANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
63 | LEE inwoo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
64 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
65 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
66 | GREGSTON Layland | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
67 | KIM Jaden | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
68 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
69 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | - | |
70 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
71 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
72 | LI Tristan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
73 | BUHEIS Lucas I. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
74 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
75 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | CHAO Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
78 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
78 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
80 | CAMPION Hasan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
81 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
82 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
83 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
84 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
85 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
87 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
88 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo Antonio | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
89 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
90 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
92 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
93 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
94 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
95 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
96 | LEE Damien | 100% | 89% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
97 | JARONIK Raymond | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
98 | THOMPSON North D. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
99 | GATZA Jason | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
100 | BUERGISSER Tae | 100% | 96% | 70% | 21% | 2% | - | |
101 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
102 | FULLER Daniel | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
103 | KENT V David | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
104 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
105 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
106 | ZELTSER Eric S. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.