Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
2 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
3 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
3 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
5 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
6 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
7 | ROWE Jason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
8 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
9 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
10 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
11 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
12 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
13 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
15 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
16 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
17 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 6% |
18 | KNOX James | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
19 | KEMPSON Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
20 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
21 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
22 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
23 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
24 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
26 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
27 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
28 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | LURVEY Samuel | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
32 | ZIAEE Armin | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
33 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 100% | 89% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
34 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | WU Marcus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
36 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
37 | MING Isaac | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | CHERPELIS George | 100% | 81% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
41 | WANG Max S | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
42 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.